The truth could walk among man and was not recognized, this is mentioned several times in the Bible, Luke 24:13-35, John 21:4, Mark 9:32, John 20:15, and if you look at the explanations on the internet of some of the so called experts I tend to burst out laughing at first but then I feel like crying. Such as, he wore different cloths or to physically covering his face. You might recall that parables, cover the face of truth. And does Jesus Christ not represent the face of truth? How could they be true believers if they look at the text with a mindset that thinks on such simplistic level? You often hear things such as, they were clever back then, but we are more advanced nowadays, they did think the earth was flat etc.

The truth is that their knowledge of the laws of G-d, and therefore the laws of nature were far ahead of present day knowledge. Special advisor to the Prince of Wales charities Tony Juniper, HRH the Prince of Wales and Ian Skelly in their new book “Harmony: a new way of looking at the world”: “We need to escape the straight jacket of the Modernist world view, he writes, so that we can reconnect our collective outlook to those universal principles that underpin the health of the natural world and keep life’s myriad diversity within the limits of Nature’s capacity.”

We must shake off scientific materialism – a reductive philosophy that has become entrenched in modern culture. Before the rise of modern science, practically every culture viewed the world as an intelligible whole, with a structure that matched the human mind. As the Prince sees it, unless we can learn to see the world as an intrinsically orderly and meaningful cosmos we have no hope of dealing with the environmental dangers that threaten the Earth. Only in this way can we find a way out from “the age of disconnection”.

One of the inset quotations that adorn this lavishly produced volume is from the Emerald Tablet of Hermes, a text medieval alchemists believed was part of a tradition going back to ancient Egypt. The book follows the Hermetic school in maintaining that the structures of sacred buildings reflect patterns in the cosmos.

The notion that wisdom can be found in a hidden spiritual tradition attracted many 20th-century writers, including Yeats and TS Eliot. It features in Aldous Huxley’s The Perennial Philosophy (1945), and informs the work of the poet Kathleen Raine (1908-2003), one of the founders of the Tenemos Academy of which the prince is patron. Alongside modern science, there has always been a counter-tradition, a “golden thread” (as the prince describes it) of esoteric thinking, which insists that humankind and the cosmos are linked together in a necessary balance.

Harmony is essentially a manifesto for this anti-modernist hermeticism. It will surely provoke furious hostility from those who think materialism is the only view of things consistent with science, but the chief value of Harmony may be in challenging the dogmatic certainties of modern rationalism. Science is a method, not a fixed body of knowledge, and the so-called scientific outlook is a succession of makeshift, each of them internally unstable.

Current scientific orthodoxy includes a highly mechanistic type of biology and theories of physics which redefine the very idea of matter. It is unclear how the discrepancy will be overcome, but there is nothing to say that it will be resolved in favour of materialism of the kind that figured in 19th-century disputes about religion. The claim to superior rationality of our missionaries of materialism needs to be challenged. If the Prince’s anti-modernist manifesto provokes these guardians of orthodoxy into one of their recurrent spasms of fulminating rage, so much the better.

Encouraging readers to “immerse themselves in Nature’s grammar and geometry, how it controls life on Earth and how humanity has expressed it in so many great works of art and architecture”. Harmony applies the hermetic philosophy to a wide range of practical issues. Co-authored with two others but written throughout in what is recognisably the Prince’s voice, it is an important book, which deserves to be examined with a seriousness it is unlikely to receive.

Still, one cannot help having doubts about the view of the world the book promotes. Some, pretty fundamental. If evangelical materialists make science seem more unified than it is, the Prince downplays aspects of the pre-modern world-view that do not square with contemporary thinking. The idea that a revolutionary transformation in collective life can come about by a shift in the way we think is found nowhere in the traditional wisdom he wants to revive. In ancient Europe, India, China and Africa, life was always understood to be a cyclical process. Human experience was like the natural world, an unending round of creation and destruction. The necessary balance could be disrupted; but when this occurred, Nature would return things to equilibrium.

In an interesting turnabout, a version of this ancient view seems to be supported by contemporary Earth science. The current wave of climate change is unlike others in having been triggered by human activity. But if humans have caused global warming, it does not follow that they can stop the process. The Prince of Wales writes of the Earth being under threat, and in terms of the ongoing destruction of species and habitats he is right. But climate change is not at bottom a wholly soluble problem. It is the planet restoring the balance that humans have disrupted. While we can surely be more intelligent in adapting to this shift, we cannot hope to avert it. Infinitely more powerful than its dominant species, the Earth will re-balance itself whatever humans do.

By promoting the idea of a revolution in consciousness as the remedy for contemporary ills, the Prince shows he is, after all, a modern man. As heir to the throne of the most modern country in the world, he could hardly be otherwise. Perhaps Harmony can be read as a move in preparation for the role he so clearly wants. A film version has been announced, and the anti-modern message will soon become a fleeting image in the media. However much he struggles against them, the contradictions in the Prince’s position cannot be overcome. He emerges from this book as very much like the people he wants to lead – anxiously looking for a way out from the intractable difficulties we presently confront, while remaining stuck fast in the disconnected modern world. So when life is bound by a cyclical process then there must be a structural process involved. In other words a process governed by sets of laws that links all together. If the ancients were able to point this out then they must have been familiar with it, “them”, and Jesus must have meant this with Mark 4:10-12 which is one of the most difficult passage in the New Testament. These verses, with parallels in Matthew 13:10-15 and Luke 8:9-10, indicate that Jesus wanted to hide truth as well as reveal it. Mark 4 opens, “He taught them [a crowd] many things by parables” (verse 2). The chapter then relates the parable of the sower (verses 3-8).

Jesus’ disciples didn’t get the point. “When he was alone, the Twelve and the others around him asked him about the parables. He told them, ‘The secret of the kingdom of God has been given to you. But to those on the outside everything is said in parables so that, “they may be ever seeing but never perceiving, and ever hearing but never understanding; otherwise they might turn and be forgiven”‘” (verses 10-12). Here Jesus quoted Isaiah 6:9-10.

Is the kingdom of God a secret, given only to a chosen few? Did Jesus tell his parables, which seem so simple, so accessible and so timeless, to keep outsiders from understanding the truth? Does God not want to forgive sinners?

No one can come to Christ unless first drawn by God the Father (John 6:44). Yet God does not want “anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance” (2 Peter 3:9). In fact, God “commands all people everywhere to repent” (Acts 17:30). The explanation of the parable has in fact been published in the Bible, so that everyone can read it.

Jesus directed the story of the sower to each listener “who has ears to hear” (Mark 4:9). Jesus’ message demands that we respond. “This is the one I esteem,” God says, “he who is humble and contrite in spirit, and trembles at my word” (Isaiah 66:2). But not everyone approaches the truth of God in the same manner. Jesus intended that people understand the parable of the sower. After all, he went right on to explain it (Mark 4:14-20). Different people respond differently when confronted with the truth. Some of the sown seed (representing the Word of God) is eaten by birds (snatched away by Satan). Some falls on shallow soil and fails to survive in the hot sun (hearers not rooted in the truth). Some is choked by thorns (cares of this life). But some of the seed falls on good soil and produces a crop (hearers who accept God’s truth and produces spiritual fruit).

The hidden treasure, Matthew 13:44; or the pearl of great price, verses 45-46, show that God’s kingdom is so valuable we can happily abandon all else for it. But not only Jesus, the old testament gave insights that were hidden from those who’s minds were enslaved by the “Devil”. This becomes clear when one looks at the numbers given. The one most of you will be familiar with, is the 40 days and 40 nights. Is it not therefore most remarkable that each passing solar year can very effectively and perfectly be measured and metered out by keeping track of every 40th day? Essentially, the annual transit which completes every 365.24219 days can just EXACTLY be cross-referenced to a tally of those days that make up a 40-day cycle! This respective axiom is easy to prove in the regard that 1 day in a cycle of 40 days (the 40th day) inherently comprises 2.5 percent of the time stream. This rate is also inherently equal to 9.131055 days per year (on average). 2.5 percent of all days = 9.131055 days per year.

For the purposes of presenting a clear analysis, the rate of a unique day in each and every cycle of 40 days (the 40th day) will be typed or classed to be a rate of those days that are accounted for apart from other days comprising the annual cycle. Through this interpretation, those days classed or typed as “40th days” should routinely be counted outside or set apart from the other days, which are generally classed or typed as “annual days”.

The rate of the solar year can quite perfectly be correlated to a fixed count of the other day units (a number of “annual days”) using a calendar count of 9 years as is diagrammed below. This ultimately means that, through the time track of an unbroken cycle of 40 days, a fixed count of annual days or calendar days (356 days) can always be counted out in correspondence with each passing year cycle.

The following diagram attempts to show that a fixed number of solar-day units can effectively be correlated to the rate of each passing solar year. This correlation or cross-reference only requires that each passing 40th day (9.131055 days per year on average) always be counted apart from all of the other days (or those days counted as annual days or calendar days).

_____________________________________

A PERFECT 9-YEAR CALENDAR *
_____________________________________
Renewal = 1 day
Year 1 = 356 days
Year 2 = 356 days
Year 3 = 356 days
Year 4 = 356 days
Year 5 = 356 days
Year 6 = 356 days
Year 7 = 356 days
Year 8 = 356 days
Year 9 = 356 days
* – Each 40th day (a perpetual rate) must be leaped or intercalated apart from days comprising the cited calendar count.
____________________________________
Calendar count = 3205.00000 days
40th (uncounted rate) = 82.17949 days
Average 9-year rate = 3287.17949 days
Annual calendar rate = 365.24217 days
Actual solar-year rate = 365.24219 days
Average difference = 2 seconds (!!!)

A quite exact cross-reference between the cycle of the solar day and the cycle of the solar year can thus be recognized in the rate of a 40-day cycle–where the rate of 1 day in 40 days is equal to 2.5 percent of time and the rate of 3205 days in 9 years is equal to 97.5 percent of time. (The combination of these two rates of days–when extended perpetually throughout time can be used to effectively account for 100 percent of the passage of each annual circle on the average).

It should be clear from the calendar diagram presented that each passing solar year can very effectively be measured and metered out in correspondence with a number of 356 days but only as long as 40th days are not counted (or leaped) among the calendar days.

Note that the modern rate of solar year (which is 365.24219 days) can quite perfectly be metered out in correspondence with the cited number of calendar days (3205 days across 9 years). An annual difference of only 2.2 seconds per year is the inherent result of tracking 40th days separately from the time stream–as a perpetual rate.

An anciently tracked time cycle.

Biblical and miscellaneous sources somewhat graphically describe that a cycle of 40 days was time tracked among the ancients. The early time track of 40 days can be recited from the book of Exodus where it is shown that Moses was in the mount for 40 days and 40 nights (refer to Chapter 24:10-18). The calendar term “40 days and 40 nights” is again recorded in the book of Deuteronomy, where Moses wrote: “And I stayed in the mount … to the rishown yowm (or to the 1st day , or the beginning day), 40 days and 40 nights… ” (refer to Chapter 10:10).

This respective passage shows “the 1st day” as immediately following 40 days and 40 nights. This usage of “rishown yowm” (or 1st day, or beginning day) tends to indicate the early use of a cyclical or a chronological count of 40 days.

It seems pertinent to note that the ancients would probably have understood the “epoch day” or the “beginning day” of a cycle of 40 days to be special or unique–as is further shown below.

The track of 40 days and 40 nights as a cyclical count can also be recited from the book of Genesis  Chapters 7 and 8. In this respective book, a span of 40 days is shown in the 2nd month of the year, and again a span of 40 days is listed in association with the 10th month of the year. These two spans of 40 days obviously pertain to two different time cycles. Of further significance is that the two respective cycles are listed in an order or in a sequence that could be chronological.

The Jewish philosopher: Philo Judaeus (c. 25 BC – 45 AD) made a reference to the cyclical 40-day count of Genesis–as follows: “… the overflow of the deluge took place for forty days… [thereafter] a hope of RENEWAL took place at intervals of forty days… ” (Questions and Answers on Genesis, Part 2:33).

Other passages in the book of Genesis do further point to the possibility that the ancients did once time track 40 days in an unbroken cycle. Of considerable significance is that the author of Genesis has the flood of Noah occurring 1656 years from the epoch of creation. This number of years (1656) happens to exactly be divisible by 9 years. Furthermore, the number of days in 1656 years happens to be divisible by 40 days (plus 1 day). I will get back to this period of 1656 years further down this article.

Based upon the several usages of a cycle of 40 days–as they appear in the book of Genesis–it can ultimately be concluded that the author of Genesis was knowledgeable of the cited system of tracking time across a 9-year calendar.

A time span of 40 days can further be recited from the book of Genesis. This instance is in reference to a formal process for embalming the Egyptian dead (refer to Genesis 50:3).

Other Biblical books also contain instances of the ancient reckoning of a time cycle that was “40 days” in length. Some passages of text show “40 days and 40 nights”, or more than “40 days”. The additional wording (40 nights) was added to distinguish that a respective instance was in reference to time tracking the rate of the solar year. Essentially, a cyclical (unbroken) count of 40 days and 40 nights have been required so as to effectively measure and meter out each passing solar year–as previously described. And there is one requirement that will become clear once other articles have been studied.

The following other instances of the usage of a time cycle of “40 days”, or “40 days and 40 nights”, can be recited from various passages of the Bible–as follows:
• According to certain precepts recorded in Chapter 12 of the book of Leviticus, a woman who had given birth to a male child was to endure a period of 40 days in her purification. However, a woman who had given birth to a female child was to endure a period of 80 days in her purification.
• In the book of Numbers, the Israelites are shown to have first searched the promised land (Canaan) for a duration of 40 days.
• According to the book of 1 Kings, the prophet Elijah fasted for 40 days and 40 nights during his journey to the mountain of God (refer to 19:8).
• A superstitious regard for this respective time cycle (40 days) appears to have also been held among others of the prophets. For example, the prophet Jonah warned: “Yet 40 days, and Nineveh shall be overthrown” (refer to Jonah 3:4).
• Primal Christians can also be recited to have held special regard for a time span of 40 days. According to the synoptic Gospels, Jesus fasted and was “there in the wilderness forty days, tempted of Satan… ” (refer to Mark 1:13).

Christians subsequent to the time of the 1st century appear to have likewise held a superstitious regard for this particular span of time. For example, a Lenten period of 40 days is mentioned in Christian literature of the 4th century. A very early method for computing Easter each year appears to have been predicated–at least in part– upon a cyclical count of the 40th day (Greek: tessarakoste). This practice of counting a 40-day cycle can perhaps most clearly be recognized among Celtic Christians– where Passover/Easter appears to have been celebrated in association with an 84-year cycle. (Note that the number of days in 84 years is exactly divisible by 40 days). The annual custom of observing Lent continues to be practised among a large segment of modern Christians.

The peculiar ancient reckoning of 9th parts of the year (40 days) can also be interpreted from various early artefacts and monuments. For example, the ruins of a second-century synagogue near Tiberias indicate an ancient regard for the seasons of the year. At this respective site, a floor mosaic depicting a zodiac wheel and nine columns arranged in three rows of three was recently discovered. Also, in the region of Stonehenge in England, recent digs have detected the ancient placement of nine circles of wooden poles. The Nebra Sky Disk–discovered in Germany–has rather conclusively been dated to the time of the Bronze Age. This artefact, in particular, indicates that the ancients would have been familiar with calendar count of 40 days:

The indicated Hebrew regard for tracking time in cycles of 40 days may have grown as a result of coming into contact with Egyptian astronomers. Egyptians are on record as having reckoned each third part of the year. This determination of third parts could conveniently and accurately have been made by tracking a cycle of 40 days–as previously has been shown.

It here seems pertinent to note that the ruling aristocracy of certain ancient cultures (including Egyptian) claimed ancestry from 9 specific gods (the ennead). This reverence for the ennead (nine) points to the ultimate possibility that some among the ancients did reckon each 9th part of the year (or each term of 40 days) in reference to the dominion of a specific god (9 per year).

Various flood stories from around the world can also be recited in evidence that the ancients did once track time in 9 parts. Though most of these flood stories seem preposterous, and though many of these tales tend to exceed on interpretation, can be considered to be real or literal, it remains to be somewhat significant that a time track of “nine” or “nines” is rather frequently referenced. The following instances of time cycles pertaining to the number “nine” or “nines” are subsequently listed from various of the several stories that pertain to a cataclysmic flood:
• Ancient Greek literature relates that “Zeus sent a flood to destroy the men of the Bronze Age. Prometheus advised his son Deucalion to build a chest… after floating in the chest for nine days and nights, landed on Parnassus. When the rains ceased, he sacrificed to Zeus, the God of Escape.” [Apollodorus, 1.7.2]
• Plato wrote that a number of “great deluges have taken place during the nine thousand years” since Athens and Atlantis were prominent”. [”Timaeus” 22, “Critias” 111-112]
• According to Lithuanian legend, water and wind once destroyed the Earth in 20 days and 20 nights. Those who survived the flood did jump 9 times and 9 other couples rose up. From the 9 couples that rose, the Lithuanian tribes originated. [Gaster, Myth, Legend, and Custom in the Old Testament, 1969]
• According to Burmese legend, a flood came and a brother and sister took refuge in a boat. In this boat were 9 birds and 9 staves. In correspondence with each day of the flood, a bird and a stave were let loose from the boat. On the 9th day, the 9th bird was heard to sing and the 9th stave did strike the bottom. After the flood was over, the sister gave birth. Unfortunately, a witch cut the baby into pieces where 9 roads met. Along these 9 roads, the nations of the Earth sprang from the slain child’s parts. [ibid.]
• In a Transylvania n legend, a certain man promised he would return in 9 days. On the 9th day, the man returned and announced the coming of a cataclysmic flood. This great flood lasted for the duration of a whole year. [Frazer, Folk-Lore in the Old Testament, 1919]
• Indians of the Sacramento Region relate that the chief of all the nations did once overlook great flood waters for the duration of 9 sleeps. He ultimately grew invincible after the 9 sleeps were past. [ibid.]
• Certain Chinese writings relate that 2 children lived inside a gourd for 99 days. A flood eventually lifted the gourd to the top of a mountain. After the flood was past, the sky then held 9 Suns and 7 Moons. Using a dragon’s bow, the children shot down all but a single Sun and Moon. The 2 children then became married and–from their 12 offspring–the various races on Earth originated. [Miller, South of the Clouds: Tales from Yunnan, 1994]

Of related significance is that numerous other stories about the event of a cataclysmic flood have been passed down among many societies (from all around the world).

Summary

It is remarkable that the time track of a cycle of 40 days can be used to very effectively measure and meter out the rate of each passing solar year.

Currently, the track of a cycle of 40 days can be used to determine the epoch of the annual transit to within the average limits of only 2.2 seconds per year.

Cited measure of the annual transit only requires keeping a tally of one day in each cycle of 40 days. The result of subtracting 40th days from out of the time stream is a fixed calendar count of 3205 days in correspondence with every cycle of 9 years.

A PERFECT 9-YEAR CALENDAR *
_____________________________________
Renewal = 1 day
Year 1 = 356 days
Year 2 = 356 days
Year 3 = 356 days
Year 4 = 356 days
Year 5 = 356 days
Year 6 = 356 days
Year 7 = 356 days
Year 8 = 356 days
Year 9 = 356 days
* – Each 40th day (a perpetual rate) must be leaped or intercalated apart from days comprising the the cited calendar count
____________________________________
Calendar count = 3205.00000 days
40th (uncounted rate) = 82.17949 days
Average 9-year rate = 3287.17949 days
Annual calendar rate = 365.24217 days
Actual solar-year rate = 365.24219 days
Average difference = 2 seconds (!!!)

A fixed count of 3205 days in association with the passage of 9 solar circles requires that the intercalation each 40th day be continued in perpetuity. (The cited count of 40 days must never be pre-empted or be broken) Essentially, the respective cycle of 40 days must here be interpreted to be primary and independent from the confines of the annual circle.

Of additional significance concerning the track of 40 days is that some early cultures appear to have attributed religious significance to this respective time span. To the princes of Egypt, adherence to this respective cycle was believed to mirror a lifestyle that was lived by the gods. Among ancient Hebrews and early Christians, a cycle of 40 days was probably not held in the same religious regard. Even so, the passage of this respective time cycle was given a certain amount of very serious consideration. Primal or original Christians did probably routinely fast on the 40th days. By the 4th century, a 40-day fast was widely practised. This custom of fasting for 40 days (Lent) continues to be practised by a segment of modern Christians.

According to Biblical and related sources, YHVH commanded the Israelites to track and celebrate a jubilee calendar as a condition of living in the promised land. Even though early adherence to a jubilee calendar appears to be indicated. The Israelites were also aware of the cited calendar system of counting 40 days. The Genesis record–in dating the epoch of the flood–is just short of being explicit in showing that a calendar predicated upon a track of 40 days did originate with the epoch of creation.

Returning to more of the astronomical significance of time tracking a 40-day cycle, each passing solar year can effectively be measured and metered out by simply counting solar days–as cited. In this modern era, the epoch of each passing solar year can inherently be determined to within the limits of 2.2 second (on average).

Because Earth’s spin appears to be slowing down by a tiny amount with each passing century, it can be recognized that the track of a 40-day cycle could have been used to exactly (perfectly!) measure and meter the solar-year rate in some era of the past. The era when the solar year could have been perfectly measured and metered out using a track of 40 days was probably within very recent centuries. While this minute change is also included in these laws 2.2 seconds will be sufficient for the purpose of this article.

________________________________________________________

Biblical Time Cycles

A calendar count of 40 days is significant in the regard that a perfect solar calendar (a 9-year calendar) is the inherent result of intercalating each and every 40th day from out of the time stream. This respective calendar count also is significant for interpreting certain passages of Bible text.

The early use of a calendar count of 40 days can especially be recited from portions of the book of Genesis. It is here of significance that the creation of Adam coincided with the very first day and year of the previously described solar calendar.

The author of Genesis has the event of the flood as occurring in the 1656th year of human history [= 1656 years from the creation of Adam]. A time span of 1656 years happens to be exactly divisible by 9 years. This pegs the creation of Adam to the first year of the stated calendar system. Furthermore, a time span of 1656 years (when counted out in day units) is inherently divisible by a time cycle of 40 days (+ 1 day). Thus, an origin for the stated calendar system of tracking 40 days cycles was oriented to the very first day of Adam’s life.

Because a calendar system predicated upon a time track of 9 years has been within the knowledge of those author-priests who preserved the writings of the Bible, it then seems very probable that other events recorded in the Bible (including some of the prophecies) are keyed to the chronology of the stated Genesis calendar.

Those familiar with the structure shown in the articles know there are 8 and one hidden within 8 + 1=9 and 7 on the outer rim. 8 + 1 or 1 and 8, 18 and 81 a mirror image like the two sides good and evil, a tree with its roots in heaven and branches on earth. And one, therefore one with its roots on earth and branches/fruits in heaven. Left or right, beginning and end, the significance of this 18, is found on a Sumerian clay tablet: they do not know the true value/meaning of 18 and its mirror image 81. I am talking about cycles and it will become clear when we look at the zodiac cycle as Plato stated 25920 years and the 144 “another biblical number” and divide this great year 25920 by 144, indeed it equals 18. The Kabbalah mentions that there are 32 paths on the tree, and if 18 represents a cyclic structure then each of these paths is “either smaller or greater 18” so a full cycle is 32 times 18 which equals 576. NOW, the circumference of the 8 described in the articles is indeed 576 degrees! And the Bible de-scribes, the scribes describe the very structure creation is based upon, and the structure writes creation, the very reason why not one iota should be altered or it would all collapse. Yes, with one thing missing in its perfectness it would not work.

Now if we take the 32 paths and multiply it by 81 we get 25920 again as it should be, cause and effect, if there is the one then there is the other, such is the tree of which it was said not to eat, this 81, going from 18 to 81 can be seen as a path, a story line and after a long journey 81 is reached, the Bible mentions 144.000 to be saved, if we divide this 81.000 by 144.000 or in other words the long journey being divided by the blessed gives 0.5625 and this my dear readers is the ARK of Covenant,”2.5 x 1.5 x 1.5” a covenant G-d made with you, a promise, the stone tablets as explained before are circular, and over-lap each other to form the 8 “ the hexagram and pentagram” and are within the Ark. Including the staff or 1. And because they believed in false gods, the knowledge that binds was broken into pieces “the 288 broken pieces of the vessel that fell to earth”, and its mirror in heaven 882 gives 117.0 a value that means Majestic, great one, noble, of kings, and the book: songs of songs has 117 verses. And 5148 characters. All multiples of 9. now 18 times 81 is 1458 , 1458 + 5148 is 6606.

This journey is described by the Ark of Noah “ it rained for 40 days and 40 nights” on the great “zodiacal” ocean. Its size 3.00 x 5.0 x 3.0 is 45 and 45 times 1458 equals 6561.0 the mirror of 1656 mentioned earlier in this article, added gives you 8217, but there was an opening of one cubit in the Ark at its centre 45 divided by 2 is 22.5 and 8217 divided by 22.5 gives you 365.2 a year, but a mirror of this number is the very cubit 52.36. and 3652 plus 5236 is 8888. each 4 “0” year a day is added, now 365.2 x 4 is 14608.

If we multiply this by the Ark of Covenant 56.25 we get 8217. This mirroring is part of the structure and movement much like that of a clock, where the dials are on its way up from 6 to 12 and from 12 to 6. But do not simply look at numbers as a quantitative, but as a qualitative also, just like the Greek whereas the 8 on its side means eternity. When you do this and read the story again then it becomes clear the story follows a pattern and the pattern follows the story.

8217 is also equal to 5625 + 2592 the Ark of Covenant and the zodiac cycle. 82+17 is 99 like 18+81, 99 is the value of AMEN. 8+2+1+7=18, 5+6+2+5=18 ,2+5+9+2=18.

Yes, mankind, humanity after the fall of Babylon lost the insight of the true language of creation, present day language is the language of confusion.

 

1-11-2010

Moshiya van den Broek