{"id":2538,"date":"2019-10-16T14:41:40","date_gmt":"2019-10-16T13:41:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.truth-revelations.org\/?page_id=2538"},"modified":"2019-10-16T14:41:40","modified_gmt":"2019-10-16T13:41:40","slug":"their-struggle","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.truth-revelations.org\/?page_id=2538","title":{"rendered":"Their struggle"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Both scientists and men of the cloth have been taught what to think, they were given the rules and tools, but what they have not learned is how to think. Nor did they ever learn to know themselves in the way that would free them from their bonds or shackles. To illustrate the blindness it causes, let\u2019s take a mathematician, he hasn\u2019t got the physical object in front of him, he just has a problem which he seeks to solve through both his conditioned mindset and the math tools he\u2019s been taught. Their goal of course is to try to understand and solve the riddle before them, the speed of this, the weight of that, its mass temperature, which particles of the periodic table are present, you name it. They describe its path, what it does, a blackboard full of equations, some that they work with were so complicated that most who use them don\u2019t fully understand them but they use these equations and those who are not familiar with them may think they know the object they describe. Even those mathematicians may think they do. The link below describes the work of a few scientists that think they have found a predictable rule for twin prime numbers, not the higher numbers but in the low range. Don\u2019t worry, we are not going to go all mathematical on you, but just look at it, all complex math, but a little further down is shown geometrically a circle with 6 parts, so much simpler that most of us can understand it. When I look at a tree or a flower I can see a pattern and with that pattern in mind I seek to understand it, they look at math and try to make the math to work, but wouldn\u2019t it be better to look at the pattern and match up the math? Just like Fibonacci did when he looked at the rabbits and how they would multiply. Theoretical mathematics takes their learned concepts as right and build upon it, and where it doesn\u2019t, they create either new particles or new dimensions. If I build something that doesn\u2019t work I start anew, of course I seek to find out why it doesn\u2019t work. Nature isn\u2019t as complex as their math makes it out to be, but have a look at it first:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.wired.com\/story\/a-big-question-about-prime-numbers-gets-a-partial-answer\/\">https:\/\/www.wired.com\/story\/a-big-question-about-prime-numbers-gets-a-partial-answer\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>While we are on this\nsubject, the golden ratio, nearly everywhere they mention 1,618, while the\ncubit x 5 shows 2,618. One of the scientists asked me, with the intent to\ndisprove that the blueprint can\u2019t explain or show that it\u2019s linked to a bigger\npattern if I could show that the 137,5\u00b0 of where branches of plants \/trees are\nlocated also fits anywhere else.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So we take the circle of\n360 and divide it by 137,5 and we get 2,618\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Now I\u2019ve explained that\nthe zodiac is 25920, but we have to take out the 0.18 for man, so we end up\nwith 25918,2 let\u2019s see 137,5 times the cubit 52,36 equals 71,995 x 360 equals\n25918,2.<br>\n30 x 71,995 = 2159,85 for each zodiac sign. You think it\u2019s big enough? <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The tree of knowledge or\nour 3D world of good and evil 576 x 137,5 = 7920 the diameter of the earth in\nmiles. 137,5 x the tree of life 480 = 66. And as you may know 792 is a sacred\nnumber held high by Freemasons, as above so below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But I like to explain\nsomething important here before I go on, we have words and we give meaning to\nthem each through its own objective, and they don\u2019t necessarily mean the same\nthing for everyone. Yet most who read the bible and are convinced that they\nfully understand it and that their interpretations are correct do not\nunderstand that the original languages were very different and could therefore\nnever reveal an underlying truth. But this is also the case for those who use\nnumbers found in the bible, because numbers are more than that, they spell out\nthe words like our language does, but in our language the meaning is found in\nthe interpretation of the word while in the ancient language it\u2019s the letters\/\nnumbers that give meaning to it. Examples can be found in several articles. Even\nto the point that a name\u2019s letters describe the path it takes. Clearly seen by\nthe fact that their name changes when they have reached a certain state of\nbeing. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>About 50 years ago the\nbig C word (consciousness) was a taboo word that no scientist would utter as it\nwould lead to them being seen as a crackpot, now they all like to mention it as\npart of quantum physics, and here too, without knowing what it is, they will\ntell you its effects on their experiments. Bathed in all sorts of mathematical equations\nit may give the impression that they know, but some among them dare to say that\nit\u2019s safe to say that none of them understands quantum physics, they simply\naccept the equations from those who were given Nobel prices and use them as\nthey were thought. But their theories can\u2019t connect the world of the small with\nthat of the large, as if there are two different laws. Somewhere between these\ntwo they got lost, so in an effort to find the answers they seek to look deeper\ninto the world of particles or further into the distance of the universe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These come up with some\ntheories and set out to proof them. And herein lies the major problem, to seek\nto proof something comes from believing their theory to be right, do not forget\nthere are big funds and great fame that awaits them, but when such things\nbecome the motivator or driver behind it, then they will fight to hold on to\ntheir financed research.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So when they reach such point through building on their gained knowledge of what something does, with formulas to match, and find that it doesn\u2019t result in solving it, like in the case of the world of the small and large, then instead of going back to the so called drawing board they simply add another particle or more dimensions to it. But they will under no circumstances abandon their theory. So when they run into trouble like the double slit experiment they come up with light being a wave at some point and a particle at another, based on another theory of light which is already fundamentally wrong. This has happened throughout the scientific community.<br>Be it magnetism, light, gravity and dark matter, which must be there because their theory can\u2019t work without it. It dictates that matter must be the cause of an expanding universe. Some of those theories have become so complex that they are blindly accepted and build upon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It reminds me of Columbus\nhaving discovered the Americas is still being taught at schools, and they still\nare looking for the missing link between monkey and man, another one of a lack\nof seeing, as there is no missing link, and the answer is simplex and so\nlogical. No, I am not going to simply say &nbsp;god created, because present day religion\ndoesn\u2019t do much better either nor is it open for truth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>While many think that technology\nwill lead us to great &nbsp;heights, a kind of\ngalactic race according to Michio Kaku, it\u2019s sad to see that the height of a\ncivilization is measured by its technology.<br>\nSo is it then consciousness? No, consciousness is an animalistic quality which should\nbecome clear when you read the articles, it doesn\u2019t really know right from\nwrong except what has shaped it, be it cultural, educational, environmental etc.\nIt\u2019s purely matter related , it has several levels, organs too have a level of\nconsciousness just as cells have an exchange of information and so a\nconditioning. Then what? A rise in awareness? Well aware of what? If you\nidentify with this persona \u201cI\u201d then it\u2019s the conditioned that represents that\nawareness. Know thyself, but like many who consider to know themselves do not\nrealise they are really slaves of conditioning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>To discover this within taking\nplace is a first step towards a true spiritual life but it\u2019s still like looking\nin a mirror and saying that\u2019s me, or like identifying with the holographic\nimage projected instead of being the light that produces that image. That light\nis you could say the soul in which you have to awaken.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nowadays many are\ntalking about awakening because they see the enslavement of greed, lust, envy, selfishness\nin others. Just look at all the conspiracy sites, that\u2019s not to say it isn\u2019t\nso, but to quote Christ, pointing at a splinter in the eye of another while\nignoring the beam in thy own eye. Yes they are worse than yours but I guarantee\nthat they say that of you, it\u2019s the nature of the beast, the many masks called\nlegion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Our kids need to learn\nthese things, not what to think but how to think, how to see, and how to\nprevent these splinters entering their eyes, otherwise we fail them and they\nwill follow in our footsteps making the same mistakes we taught them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Then and only then will there\nbe a future worth living in.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Any of you who have\nseriously studied the articles know that I clearly outline the way on how to\n(in 4 ways) 1, to read them as you read to memorize (not to contemplate)\n7 times, 2,then to read them like you read a book 7 times, 3,then\nyou read and contemplate, try to understand and reflect 7 times and 4, bring\ninto practise. And print them out to do so. The reason for this may not be\nobvious at first, but I\u2019ll give you a little hint, how you and your\nsubconscious gathers data and how it affects you in thought, action and\nreasoning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Some of you might not\nfollow this order or only read as they usually do but I suggest to those who don\u2019t\nfollow this order to look up \u201cLectio Divina\u201d, Latin for divine reading on\nWikipedia or google.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>14-10-2019 <br>Moshiya van den Broek <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Both scientists and men of the cloth have been taught what to think, they were given the rules and tools, but what they have not learned is how to think. Nor did they ever learn to know themselves in the way that would free them from their bonds or shackles. To illustrate the blindness it [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":296,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-2538","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.truth-revelations.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2538","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.truth-revelations.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.truth-revelations.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.truth-revelations.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.truth-revelations.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2538"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.truth-revelations.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2538\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2539,"href":"https:\/\/www.truth-revelations.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2538\/revisions\/2539"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.truth-revelations.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/296"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.truth-revelations.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2538"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}